It’s absurd for Trump to promote good character. But character counts now more than ever.

On Thursday 19th at 11:17 am Alyssa Rosenberg wrote on the Washington post section opinion blog about: It's absurd for Trump to promote good character. But character counts now more than ever. In this post, Alyssa explains to us how it's important to presented or have a good character as the moment such like this where the world is going up down. Promoting a good character can help to restore peace and improve the relationship between President Trump and America people, And the united state with other Nation around the world.
But the most important think Alyssa underlined is about president Trump who was not really the good candidate to make the speech about the National character weeks, because for Alyssa once again President Trump was so ridiculous because his speech was not appropriate, he was talking about the football league, lying about  his predecessor's treatment of the gold star family to excuse his own lapses, and Alyssa said the ridiculous act was to fire the director of the FBI.
Alyssa wrote this article on the Washington post section opinion blog, Her audience is mostly adults politicians and people who are capable to impact politics in America. Alyssa is trying to show us in this article how much it's important our character and at the same time putting President Trump in the picture like the one who supposed to promote this value but at the end is the one who doesn't show himself like a model.
Even we should have the culture of investigation any time we read an article on internet, Alyssa has been writing for the Washington post for a long time and before she was writing for the New York times and was doing broadcast TV so she is trustful, her hard work and the credibility of the articles she wrote  give her a name that can be trusted in the Washington Post.
This article was writing to show how having good character can drain our country to a better result and if this good character is wearing by the most powerful citizens in this country is a big chance.
In this article I totally agreed with Alyssa because since Trump is president I never see him react like a great leader, every speech he has to criticize his predecessor even for no reason valuable is why until now people don't know which health insurance we will be using in 2018, he fights Obamacare just because is his predecessor idea, so what? he is not capable until now to give us a better insurance.
when I see him, his character is not compassionate he reacts like he doesn't care when he smile is like it was forcing to do so, for all that I totally agreed with Alyssa the President need to have good character.

Probability sample vs Non-probability sample survey

On September 28 the Washington post  under the rubric Opinion Catherine Rampell write a rubric name( https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/rampage/wp/2017/09/28/free-speech-and-good-vs-bad-polls/catherine Rampell ) free speech and good vs bad polls. In this article she talk about how her survey methodology was criticized as a "junk science" just because she used what is sometimes called a “non-probability” sample which is another way to do some polling survey. the critic was made in a Guardian article by reporter Lois Beckett because it was conducted online, using what is sometimes called a “non-probability” sample. let explain the difference between the probability survey and the non-probability survey. A probability sample is one in which each person in the population has an equal or at least known chance (probability) of being selected, while in a non-probability sample some people have a greater, but unknown, chance than others of selection. Probability samples are based on the mathematical theory of probability. But for me I totally agree with Catherine today most of the survey are conducted online using the non-probability sample. And non-probability sample offer more flexibility than the probability survey. A non-probability sample may be more practical for some research projects. For example, there are no lists of all the people who have committed a crime or particular offence, although there are lists of convictions for individual offences. The issue then may be whether you are allowed access to such a list for research purposes. Non-probability samples may be more open to the criticism of not representing a population, but are chosen in situations where probability sampling techniques are either impractical or unnecessary. To conclude at this time the non-probability sample is the accurate to do some polling survey.